• How did a movie that can be boiled down to cowboys versus cannibals not get a full blown theatrical release? I know, I know, it is hard to fathom that an idea like that could somehow get its wide release as Video on Demand. Especially when that movie is as fantastic as Bone Tomahawk (the film only opened in 847 theaters but did $7 million in business). It’s right there in the title—Bone. Tomahawk.—the absolute promise of greatness (and yes the titular devices are utilized to great effect in the film.). Add to that awesome title and great premise a phenomenal actor—say like  Kurt Russell, replete with his Hateful Eight mustache—and you have the makings of a heck of a film.

    And it is! Bone Tomahawk is on par with the best Westerns of the last ten years. Russell plays the sheriff of the small town of Bright Hope. When a drifter comes to town, the sheriff is forced to shoot him in the leg when he tries to run. This particular drifter is on the run from a cannibal tribe of Native Americans whose burial ground he disturbed. When the raiding party of cannibals catches up with him at Bright Hope they steal some of the town’s horses, the sheriff’s deputy and the wife of a local construction foreman, Arthur O’Dwyer. O’Dwyer’s character is especially interesting because he is basically crippled from the get go, he suffered a leg injury that has left him with a handicap to overcome. O’Dwyer, the sheriff, his back-up deputy and the local badass gunfighter and dandy, Mr. Brooder, mount up and head after them. And that is it for plot. Simple and perfect, with lots of room to get to know our heros.

    That is one place that Bone Tomahawk shines. It develops the characters, and allows room for us to really get to like them. The dialogue is a big part of this. Each man in the party has a particular affectation when it comes to speaking. This idea could potentially become comical or grating but it completely works here. It also allows for great comments like: “Mr Brooder just educated two Mexicans on the meaning of manifest destiny” after Mr. Brooder has just gunned down two men who approached the camp at night. This gem and so many more can be mined from the minutes spent watching. The culminating effect of these lines and the amiable nature of the group help us to understand and truly enjoy the time spent with these characters. 

    Along the way we are treated to some gorgeous cinematography. This movie is stunning. The nature of the Western lends itself to such views, but the creators of Bone Tomahawk use the landscape perfectly to strike moods for the characters and to accentuate the danger that the crew finds themselves in. This works perfectly with the film’s slow burn approach. 

    The danger making a film like Bone Tomahawk is that it can get campy quickly, especially if you were making a horror/Western hybrid. Thankfully, the film is a Western that just happens to have some horror trappings. These trappings are largely confined to a blood soaked final act that I found thrilling and totally earned. The setup was perfect and the result well earned and deserved. 

    I can’t say anything more about this film, as doing so would certainly spoil it. I shall instead leave it to you, reader, to seek this film out and spend some time with it. It is time you will not regret spending.

    + ,
  • Pyewacket is an ominous word. It seems harmless enough on the surface, a childish nonsense invective but when you really listen to the word…there’s just something about it that is off. Maybe it’s the way the word can be said as a swear, or uttered in prayer, with a low guttural sound, a harsh bark and a naming convention for a black magic ritual. 

    Pyewacket is also an unsettling horror film brought to us by Backcountry director, Adam MacDonald. This film is black magic gone wrong, represented in all the right ways. The dread creeps and compounds in Jaws-like fashion. The truth of the situation is always hard to read and this movie really brings that home time and again. In fact one could argue that the one true theme of this film is belief, in not being able to trust what you know. 

    “Be careful what you believe in.” This line is uttered by an author of occult literature to our heroine Leah (played well by Nicole Muñoz), and it truly defines the experience of watching this film. We the viewers are never quite sure what is actually happening as events unfold, and even at the very end there is doubt as to the fate of our protagonist. 

    This is due largely in part to the fine script by MacDonald. He throws you right in the mix, you the viewer are a part of the lived-in lives of these people on screen, as much a visitor as Pyewacket itself. The audience is challenged to make inferences about the lives on display here and it plays out really well, and helps keep the movie from becoming too predictable. Couple that with a mother who is  dealing with the stress of grief and loss poorly and a teenage girl dealing with loss and upheaval and the occult. We watch as these elements all slowly coalesce to a fine finish to the film.

    Also on display here is stunning cinematography by Christian Bielz. The use of drone shots kept the movie flowing constantly and stopped things from getting stagnant when it was just Leah or her mom on screen, and Bielz has a fantastic eye for composition of shots. The cinematography is, in my opinion, what sets this story apart from others in the same vein.

    The story does little to break new ground, and even tips its hat a bit in the second and third act. Which brings me to my only real critique of the film,this is a smart film but it gets dumbed down a bit by having to explain what exactly is going on and I felt that these exposition dumps, once with a group of friends and then again with the renowned writer over skype, disrupted the mystery and the tension the creators spent almost two acts growing.

    Ultimately Pyewacket is deserving of your attention and worth a rent off of Amazon, the elevator pitch should have been, “What if wishing harm on another went a little too far?” I could go into more detail and would if it didn’t end up veering into spoiler territory.So just take my recommendation and check this one out as soon as possible..

    + ,
  • This blog is not interested in reviewing things as we think they should be. I hate critics that try to spout off and tell the reader why the film is “wrong” and “what could/should have been better/different.” Here’s a thought, tell me about the product we received as an audience, the one that someone took the time to create. If that product is incomplete or lacking, ask why; don’t mock and shred and destroy. Likewise, if a product is not what YOU as the VIEWER did not want, then too bad; the product was made the way it was and wishing it were otherwise will not help. I will not tell you to write your own or make your own version, when that happens you get one of two scenarios: the first is the cheap fanfic/slashfic phenomenon, wherein a fanbase latches onto a character and creates their own adventures and the second scenario is the reboot/recycle cycle that we witnessed with Star Wars and which we will soon see with Harry Potter. I WILL encourage you to create your own work, write your own stories, craft your own critiques and think pieces but please, just try to be original. That’s all, let the studios have their remakes. I’ll take the indies all day every day. As for this space? I’ll try to keep it just that, original or at least as original as I can make it.

    This space will be focused on exploring ideas in horror, sharing original fiction from a variety of writers, myself included, old clips and articles that I have produced in the past (for better or worse, I’m going to collate them all here) and, of course, reviews and recommendations. This has been a long time gestating, and I am happy to have finally reached the point where I can start this new endeavor.

    +